MEDITACOES DESCARTES PDF
Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. Rene Descartes Meditacoes Metafisicas 1. Felipe Albarelli. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking. Meditações-sobre-Filosofia-Primeira-René-Descartes. Ailton Santos. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by .
|Language:||English, Spanish, Japanese|
|ePub File Size:||17.85 MB|
|PDF File Size:||13.56 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
25 set. Request PDF | This dissertation investigates the argument of the real distinction Observações sobre a Sexta Meditação de Descartes. Article. Sign in. Main menu. Meditations on First Philosophy. by Rene Descartes. Translated by John Veitch ( ). INTRODUCTION · PREFACE TO THE READER · SYNOPSIS OF THE SIX .
Collins H, Evans R.
Repensando a expertise. Belo Horizonte: Fabrefactum; Canguilhem G. Paris: Seuil; Camargo Jr. Physis Rio J. Wee C, Pelczar M. Descartes' dualism and contemporary dualism. Arendt H.
Habermas J. Rorty R.
Services on Demand
Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press; Nodar J.
El inventor de la mente? Bahr F. Descartes R. In: Descartes R. Gilson E. Machamer P, McGuire J. Descartes's changing mind. Stud Hist Philos Sci ; With the Discourse out and a following of students building in Utrecht, Descartes seems to have turned his attention from career to family. Gaukroger suggests that despite this apparent denial of paternity, Descartes not only corresponds with Francine, but in brings her and Helene to his new home at Santpoort or Egmond-Binnen Gaukroger, pp.
The Discourse is important for many reasons. For instance, it tells us what Descartes himself seems to have thought of his early education, and in particular, his early exposure to mathematics.
Roger Ariew suggests that these reflections are not so much those of the historical Descartes, as much as they are those of a persona Descartes adopts in telling the story of the Discourse Ariew, pp. Uncontested, however, is the view that the Discourse sketches out the metaphysical underpinnings of the Cartesian system. And, as a bonus, it has three works that are attached to it that are apparently added so as to exemplify the method of inquiry it develops though admittedly it is unclear how the method is applied in these essays.
As was suggested earlier, the Optics and Meteorology were very likely versions of works originally intended for The World. It should be stressed that the three attached essays are important independent of the Discourse, for they contain much worth studying. It is in this work that Descartes shows how certain geometrical problems can be solved by way of algebraic equations. The significance of the sort of connection that Descartes made between geometry and algebra was great indeed, for without it the mathematization of the physics and the development of the calculus might not have happened when they did—a generation later via Sir Isaac Newton — and Gottfried Leibniz — And so, the claim that Descartes is the originator of analytic geometry, at least as we understand it today, overstates the case.
Descartes’ Life and Works
As Boyer rightly points out, however, this does not diminish the importance of the work in the history of mathematics. The Meditations In Descartes began writing the Meditations. And, in he returned to Leiden to help work out its publication. There is evidence suggesting that he was called away from Leiden around the time of her death, returning soon after. Some have speculated that he left Leiden to be at her side. Rather, it seems to have been in a letter from Mersenne that Descartes first learns of it.
In a follow up letter to Mersenne, dated 3 December , Descartes expresses regret in not having been able to see his father before his death. Mersenne sent the Meditations to philosophers and theologians for criticism. The list of critics includes: Caterus, Hobbes, Arnauld, Gassendi, and Mersenne himself, with several other unnamed readers who raised their objections through Mersenne.
A later edition would include an objection from Bordin. The Meditations opens by developing skeptical questions concerning the possibility of knowledge. Through a series of several carefully thought out meditations, the reader establishes along with the author the groundwork for the possibility of knowledge scientia. There were two styles of presentation: analytic and synthetic.
It is important not to confuse these terms with those, say, used by Kant. For Descartes the analytic style of presentation and inquiry proceeds by beginning with what is commonly taken to be known and discovering what is necessary for such knowledge. Thus, the inquiry moves from what is commonly known to first principles. By contrast, the synthetic style of presentation begins by asserting first principles and then to determining what follows.
Prompted by Mersenne, Descartes sketches out in the Second Replies a synthetic rendering of the Meditations. In establishing the ground for science, Descartes was at the same time overthrowing a system of natural philosophy that had been established for centuries—a qualitative, Aristotelian physics. But please do not tell people, for that might make it harder for supporters of Aristotle to approve them. I hope that readers will gradually get used to my principles, and recognize their truth, before they notice that they destroy the principles of Aristotle.
Specifically, the Cartesian view denies that physics is grounded in hot, cold, wet, and dry. Rather, the only properties of bodies with which the physicist can concern him or herself are size, shape, motion, position, and so on—those modifications that conceptually or logically entail extension in length, breadth, and depth.
This conception of matter, conjoined with the sort of mathematics found in the Geometry, allies itself with the work of such Italian natural philosophers as Tartaglia, Ubaldo, and Galileo, and helps further the movement of early thinkers in their attempts to establish a mathematical physics. Though the endorsement of the Learned Men would not have guaranteed that the Meditations would be accepted or used as a textbook, it could certainly be viewed as an important step to getting it accepted.
He was, it could be said, a freelancer with no academic or political ties to the university outside of his connection to Mersenne. And, he certainly lacked the credentials and reputation of someone like a Eustachius, whose widely used textbook of the period is of the sort the Meditations was in all likelihood aimed at replacing.
Although the Meditations seems to have been endorsed by the Sorbonne, it was never adopted as a text for the university. In his defense Descartes entered into the debate. The controversy would leave Regius confined to teaching medicine, and his published defense of his conception of Cartesian thought would be officially condemned by Voetius, who in five years time would rise to the position of University rector.
At the end of the debate, which off and on lasted about five years, the situation ultimately became desperate for Descartes. He feared being expelled from the country and of seeing his books burned. In , at the age of forty-seven, Descartes moved to Egmond du Hoef. With the Voetius controversy seemingly behind him though, as mentioned above, it would again raise its head and climax five years down the road , Descartes and Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia began to correspond.
In this exchange, Princess Elisabeth probed Descartes on the implications of his commitment to mind-body dualism. During this time, he completed a final draft of a new textbook, which he had begun three years earlier, the Principia Philosophiae Principles of Philosophy , and in it was published. He dedicated it to Princess Elisabeth. The Principles is an important text.
The work is divided into four Parts, with five hundred and four articles. Although it would appear to be a quick run through of the Meditations, there are a number of dissimilarities. The principles introduced in Part Two are based on the metaphysics of Part One. And, the subsequent physics developed in Parts Three and Four is based upon the principles of Part Two. Although the physics turns out to be unsound, the Principles nevertheless inspired such great thinkers as Robert Boyle — , Edmond Halley — , and Isaac Newton.
As an important side note, it must be stressed that even though Descartes had throughout his career put a great deal of emphasis on mathematics, the physics developed in the Principles does not appear to be a mathematical physics. Rather, it is traditionally taken to be a conceptual project with only a hint of empirical overtones—a physics rooted entirely in metaphysics. Two parts, never completed, were originally intended to deal with plants, animals, and man.
In light of this and what Descartes says in a 31 January letter to the mathematician Constantijn Huygens, it is plausible to think that the Principles would have looked something like The World had it been completed as planned. One of the more controversial positions the Principles forwarded, at least according to Newton, was that a vacuum was impossible.
In other words, vacuum, taken as an extended nothing, is a flat contradiction.
The corporeal universe is thus a plenum, individual bodies separated only by their surfaces. Newton argued in his De Gravitatione and Principia that the concept of motion becomes problematic if the universe is taken to be a plenum.
In line with the ancient atomist Epicurus, they argued that if matter was infinitely divisible, so dividing it would show that there was no bottom—and so, corporeality would not be substantial. So, if corporeality is substantial, as Descartes himself had claimed, there must be a minimum measure of extension that could not be divided by natural means, anyway. And so, there are atoms. But, this conclusion is something that Descartes explicitly rejects in the Principles.
During this year another prominent political figure began to correspond with Descartes, Queen Christina of Sweden. And, Regius published what he took to be a new and improved version of Cartesian science, which as we now know would draw the wrath of Voetius. In response to this, Descartes wrote a single-page printed defense that was posted on public kiosks for all to read. However, as mentioned earlier, tensions mounted as a result of the public exchange and Descartes felt his way of life in the Netherlands to be threatened.
And, after a not too lengthy correspondence, Queen Christina offered Descartes a position in her court.
For many reasons, which would certanily include those related to his concerns about Voetius, Descartes accepted the offer. And, in he left for Sweden. Queen Christina at first required very little from Descartes. However, according to Gaukroger, this would change. For, after he had some time to settle in, she ordered him to do two things: first, to put all of his papers in order, and secondly, to put together designs for an academy Gaukroger, p.
Arguably, Descartes had some idea of how the latter might be done by way of his experience in Breda. In January of Queen Christina began to require Descartes to give her lessons in philosophy.
These apparently would begin at five in the morning and would last for about five hours. They were given three days a week Gaukroger, p. During this time Descartes published the Passions, the work having emerged primarily from his correspondence with Princess Elisabeth to whom he had dedicated the Principles.Author s : Pinheiro de Oliveira, Fellipe Abstract: In Descartes' Third Meditation he states that it is manifested by the natural light "that there must be at least as much 'reality' in the efficient and total cause as in the effect of that cause" AT, VII, p.
While stationed at Breda, Descartes met Isaac Beeckman — The World and Discourse After Descartes left the army, in , his whereabouts for the next few years are unknown.
Moreover, Descartes misunderstands the doubt of the skeptics, who do not doubt for the sake of doubting, but to avoid error, and who have good reasons to be concerned about error that Descartes ignores. Paris: Seuil; So, it appears that Descartes picked up the work again. This conception of matter, conjoined with the sort of mathematics found in the Geometry, allies itself with the work of such Italian natural philosophers as Tartaglia, Ubaldo, and Galileo, and helps further the movement of early thinkers in their attempts to establish a mathematical physics.
Early Sci Med ;